Monday, June 23, 2014

female TV anchor attempts suicide, FIR against TV management; WHY NOT ARREST them ???











female TV anchor attempts suicide, Police say FIR against TV management; My question WHY NOT ARREST them ???



source : Time of India

A 31-year-old anchor with a private news channel in Noida allegedly attempted suicide on Sunday by consuming poison at the channel's office in Sector 85. The woman was immediately admitted in an ICU at Kailash Hospital and her condition is said to be stable.

Sources in the channel said the woman had posted a suicide note on a social networking website, in which she had named senior channel officials of betrayal and hatching a conspiracy against her.

On the basis of the woman's statement, police have registered FIRs against senior channel officials at Phase II police station for instigating the suicide.

According to the police, the anchor had joined the news channel a few months ago and that channel officials had informed them on Sunday morning about she suffering from depression and possibility of her taking some extreme step.

"When we went to the anchor's house, we got a call from the channel that she had already consumed poison in the office and had been admitted in Kailash Hospital," said Ravikant Parasar, SHO, Phase II.

Hospital spokesperson V B Joshi said, "She was admitted around 11:50am. The woman was in a disoriented state as she had consumed a heavy dose of poison. Her stomach had to be washed to discharge the poison. She is stable now but is under observation in the ICU," said Joshi.

Sources in the channel, however, claimed that was depressed over some issues with the management.


Friday, June 20, 2014

Want freedom? keep 7 lakhs ready. NO matter you are innocent ! poor guys DONT marry series


Husband is bringing all dowry articles to police station but wife is refusing to take them !!
Dowry articles exactly match what wife has prepared as list !!
Still husband to keep seven lakhs as Fixed deposit with the court !!! IF he wants freedom
Special thanks to Masculist GD Diwan who alerted me to this case !!
http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; http://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

*****************************disclaimer**********************************
This judgment and other similar judgments posted on this blog was / were collected from Judis nic in website and / or other websites of Govt. of India or other internet web sites like worldlii or indiankanoon. Some notes are made by Vinayak. This is a free service provided by Vinayak (pen name). Vinayak is a member of SIF - Save Indian Family Foundation. SIF is committed to fighting FALSE dowry cases and elder abuse. SIF supports gender equality and a fair treatment of law abiding Indian men. Should you find the dictum in this judgment or the judgment itself repealed or amended or would like to make improvements or comments, please post a comment on the comment section of the blog or write to e _ vinayak @ yahoo . com (please remove spaces). Vinayak is NOT a lawyer and nothing in this blog and/or site and/or file should be considered as legal advise.
 
******************************************************************
CASE FROM JUDIS / INDIAN KANOON WEB SITE
******************************************************************

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; http://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

IN THE COURT OF Ms. ANU MALHOTRA


DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE (WEST), DELHI


Bail application No. 700


State Vs. Nitin Sharma


FIR No. 83/2013


PS: Kirti Nagar

U/s: 498­A/406/34 IPC

12.03.2014


Present:


Ld. counsel Shri H.S. Sharma for the applicant­accused.


Ld. Chief Public Prosecutor Shri B.S. Kain for the State with

the Investigating Officer SI Vandana.
http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; http://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com
Ld. counsel Shri Vishnu Sharma for the complainant.


Report submitted by the Investigating Officer pursuant to the

order dated 26.02.2014 to submit that though the applicant­accused Nitin
Sharma had come with the articles of the dowry as per the admitted list
given by the parties, the complainant refused to accept the articles stating
that they did not belong to her. The Investigating Officer in reply to a
specific Court query has stated that no list of articles brought by the
applicant­ accused was prepared when they were brought to the police
station for return but that articles brought by the applicant­accused for
return are the same as per the admitted list of the parties bearing date
21.12.2012, photocopy of which be filed.
http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; http://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

On behalf of the complainant it has been submitted that

there have been repeated demands of dowry made by the applicant­
accused Nitin Sharma and his family members in order to harass and
coerce the complainant. It has also been submitted on behalf of the
complainant that the articles of dowry / istridhan of the complainant are
still in the possession of the applicant­accused and that the original bills
in relation to the purchase of articles of dowry are also in possession of
the complainant, copies of which have been supplied to the Investigating
Officer.
http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; http://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

On behalf of the applicant­accused Nitin Sharma it has been

contended that all the articles of dowry / istridhan have already been
returned except those as per the admitted list adverted to hereinabove,
which have been taken by the applicant­accused to the police station for
return but were not accepted by the complainant.

A perusal of the record indicates that parties have previously

been directed to appear before the ld. Judge Incharge, Mediation Centre,
Tis Hazari but no report till date has been received from the Mediation
Centre and a submission was made on 26.02.2014 on behalf of either side
that the mediation proceedings have not succeeded and that there is no
date fixed at the Mediation Centre.

On a consideration of the totality of circumstances of the

case and the rival submissions made on behalf of either side, subject to
the applicant­accused depositing a sum of Rs. seven lacs in the form of
an FDR in the Court of learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (West)
within a period of 10 days from today, the disbursal of which would be
subject to the outcome of trial in FIR No. 83/2013 PS Kirti Nagar, the
applicant­ accused in the event of arrest is allowed to be released on bail
on his filing a bail bond in the sum of Rs. one lac with one surety of the
like amount to the satisfaction of the IO / SHO concerned, with the
directions that he shall join the investigation of the case as and when
required by the Investigating Agency and shall not leave the country
without permission of the Court and shall not tamper with the evidence
in any manner.


(ANU MALHOTRA)
District & Sessions Judge (West)
Delhi/12.03.2014


*****************

FOLLOW http://twitter.com/ATMwithDick on twitter or http://vinayak.wordpress.com/ on wordpress or http://evinayak.tumblr.com/  FOR 100s of high court and supreme court cases
  
  
regards
  
Vinayak
Father of a lovely daughter, criminal in the eyes of a wife, son of an compassionate elderly mother, old timer who hasn't given up, Male, activist
  
  

Men BEWARE!: Chennai husband arrested having wife's "improper" photos / video on cellphone !!

dhraviyam (33) and his wife veNi ( 28) were married for 8 years. Veni has left her husband 1 year ago due to some differences. It is alleged that Dhravyam requested Veni to return back and also have conjugal relations with him. It is further alleged that Dhravyam had photos of Veni Taking bath etc in his mobile phone and threatened Veni with those photos !! Veni complained to police who have arrested Dhravyam

*****************************


செல்போனில் ஆபாச படம் எடுத்து மனைவியை மிரட்டிய கணவர் கைது


சனி, ஜூன் 21,2014, 10:20 AM IST

பதிவு செய்த நாள்: சனி, ஜூன் 21,2014, 10:20 AM IST



சென்னை,

செல்போன் தொடர்பான குற்றங்கள் உலகம் முழுவதும் அதிகமாக நடக்கின்றன.இவைகளில் முதலிடத்தில் இருப்பது ஆபாசப் படங்கள், வீடியோக்கள் தான்.அதிர்ச்சியூட்டும் அதிர்ச்சியூட்டும் இத்தகைய கேமிரா செல்போன்கள் மூலம் படம் எடுப்பதால்  ஆயிரக்கணக்கான பெண்களுடைய வாழ்க்கையை நாள் தோறும் சீரழிக்கிறது.

உடன் பணிபுரிபவர்களையோ, மாணவியையோ, தோழியையோ ஆபாசமாய் படம் எடுத்து அதை மற்றவர்களுக்குக் காண்பிக்கப் போவதாய் செய்யப்படும் "பிளாக் மெயில்" பல ஆயிரம் பெண்களுடைய கற்பையும், நிம்மதியையும், வாழ்க்கையையும் கலைத்து எறிந்திருக்கிறது. இது இப்போது குடும்பத்திற்குள்ளும் ஊடுருவி உள்ளது.

கேமிரா செல்போன்கள் உங்கள் வீட்டில் குழந்தைகளோ,  வயது சிறுமிகளோ இருந்தால் மிகவும் கவனம் தேவை. நெருங்கிய உறவினர்களானாலும், நண்பர்களானாலும் வரையறுக்கப்பட்ட சுதந்திரத்தை மட்டுமே வழங்குங்கள். கேமரா விளையாட்டுகளுக்கு அனுமதி வழங்காதீர்கள்.எந்தக் காரணம் கொண்டும் விளையாட்டாக உங்கள் உடல் "அழகை" நீங்களே புகைப்படம் எடுத்துக் கொள்ளாதீர்கள். உங்களுக்குத் தெரியாமலேயே உங்கள் மொபைலில் இருந்து அவை இன்னோர் மொபைலுக்கு திருடப்பட்டு விடலாம்

இதோ கேமிரா செல்போனால் சிதைந்து போன குடும்பம் கணவனே மனைவியை ஆபாச படம் எடுத்து மிரட்டி உள்ளான்.

சென்னையை சேர்ந்தவர் திரவியம் (33). இவரது மனைவி வேணி (28) (பெயர் மாற்றப்பட்டுள் ளது). இவர்களுக்கு திருமணமாகி 8 ஆண்டுகள் ஆகிறது.

திரவியத்துக்கு ஒரு வினோதமான ஆசை உண்டு. மனைவி குளிப்ப ரகசியமாக படம் பிடிப்பார். அவர் ஆடை மாற்றுவதையும் விட்டு வைப்பாதில்லை. மனைவியோடு உல்லாசமாக இருப்பாதையும் காமிராவில் பாதிவு செய்து ரசிப்பார். கணவரின் வினோத ஆசையை சகித்து கொண்ட வேணி ஒரு கட்டத்தில் கணவனின் 'செக்ஸ்' தொல்லை தாங்க முடியாமல் பிரிந்து சென்று விட்டார். கடந்த ஒரு வருடமாக இருவரும் பிரிந்து வாழ்கிறார்கள்.

இந்த நிலையில் திரவியம் மனைவியை சந்தித்து தன்னோடு உடல் உறவுக்கு வரும்பாடி அழைத்தார். அதற்கு மறுத்த வேணி உன்னோடு சேர்ந்து வாழ மாட்டேன் என்று கூறினார்.  அதை கேட்டு ஆவேசம் அடைந்த திரவியம் என் ஆசைக்கு இணங்காவிட்டால் உன் அந்தரங்க காட்சிகளை இணைய தளங்களில் பாரப்பி விடுவேன் என்று மிரட்டினார்.

இதனால் அதிர்ச்சி அடைந்த வேணி கணவர் மீது போலீசில் புகார் செய்தார். போலீசார் வழக்கு பதிவு செய்து திரவியத்தை கைது செய்தனர்.
அவரிடம் இருந்து கைப்பற்றப்பட்ட செல்போனில் வேணியின் அந்தரங்க போட்டோ மற்றும் வீடியோ காட்சிகள் இடம் பெற்று இருந்தது. மேலும் 2 பெண்களின் ஆபாச பாடங்களும் அந்த போனில் இருந்தது. அவர்கள் யார்? அவர்களையும் திரவியம் மிரட்டினாரா? என்பாது பாற்றி போலீசார் விசாரித்து வருகிறார்கள்.


source
http://www.dailythanthi.com/News/Districts/2014/06/21102058/Cell-phone-X-pictures-Threatened-to-arrest-her-husband.vpf

Police man in cooler for pre marital sex .. sorry Pre Marital Rape !! He allegedly raped her MANY times with a promise to marry her !!!

Vigneshwaran (21) a police man at the Coimbatore Valparai police station is in the cooler on charges of kidnapping and having sex ...sorry Raping with a +12 student. It is alleged that he took the victim away some days ago on the promise of marriage and the two had sex many times. Now the parents of the girl have complained and based on inquiry Vigneshwaran has been arrested !!
===================

Normally its courtship, proposal, marriage. In fast track cases its RAPE + MARRIAGE !!!!

Man accused of raping, beating up girlfriend turned wife

Press Trust of India

Jun 20, 2014 at 03:21pm IST


"..... "The evidence of the prosecutrix makes it highly improbable that such an incident ever took place. In fact, she has deposed that she had physical relations with the accused with her free consent," Additional Sessions Judge Nivedita Anil Sharma said......"



A man has been acquitted of charges of raping and beating his girlfriend, whom he later married, by a Delhi court after she retracted her statement.

The court freed the Ghaziabad resident while noting that the woman had deposed that physical relations between them were consensual.

"It is clear that the evidence of the prosecution is neither reliable nor believable and is not trustworthy and the prosecution has failed to establish rape.

Man accused of raping, beating up girlfriend turned wife

Ghaziabad resident acquitted of rape charge after victim tells court 'sex was consensual'

"The evidence of the prosecutrix makes it highly improbable that such an incident ever took place. In fact, she has deposed that she had physical relations with the accused with her free consent," Additional Sessions Judge Nivedita Anil Sharma said.

"The conscience of this court is completely satisfied that the prosecution has failed to bring home the charge against accused, for the offence under sections 376 (rape) and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) of the IPC," the court said.

The court noted that the woman said in her deposition that she has converted to Islam, changed her name and thereafter she got married to him on March 29 at Delhi.

Since then they are living together happily as husband and wife at Ghaziabad, she said.

A case was registered against the man on the complaint of the woman alleging that he had raped her on the evening of January 17 in Khayala area here and had also beaten her up.

The woman, however, later changed her statement. During cross examination, she deposed that about two years ago she had met the man, who developed friendship with her as he used to visit his maternal aunt (mausi) residing in her locality in Vishnu Garden.

She deposed that they started meeting very frequently and had physical relations with their free consent.

On January 17, the accused called her to meet him near a temple in Khayala at about 5.30 PM and took her to his aunt's residence where she established physical relations with him with her free consent, she told the court.

The woman claimed that she had lodged the complaint with the police at the instance and wrong advice of her well wishers after she and the man developed some misunderstanding over petty issues.

They got married in March 2014 after she converted to Islam and are living together, she said.

In her cross examination by the man's counsel, the woman admitted that he has not raped her and prayed for his acquittal.

"The prosecutrix has not deposed an iota of evidence of her being raped at all by the accused or that he gave beatings to her.

"She has not even mentioned the word 'rape' in her evidence nor has deposed anything incriminating against the accused," the court said.

"Consequently, no inference can be drawn that accused is guilty of raping the prosecutrix and of giving beatings to her. There is no material on record to suggest that the woman was ever raped and beaten by accused. No case is made out against the accused as there is no incriminating evidence against him," the court said.


source

agencies / ibn live

Thursday, June 19, 2014

$40 million compensation to 5 men wrongly convicted of 1989 Central Park rape


New York City to pay $40 million compensation to 5 men wrongly convicted of 1989 Central Park rape

Friday, 20 June 2014 - 9:53am IST | Place: NEW YORK | Agency: Reuters





  • Central Park, New York

New York City has agreed to pay $40 million to five men who were convicted, and later exonerated, of brutally raping a female jogger in Central Park in 1989, settling a long-fought civil rights lawsuit, according to a person familiar with the matter. 

The violent attack, which came to be known as the "Central Park jogger case", made national headlines as a sign that the city's crime rate had spiraled out of control, while the outcome of the prosecution raised questions about race and the justice system.

The victim was a white while the defendants, were either black or Hispanic.The five men – Antron McCray, Kevin Richardson, Raymond Santana, Korey Wise and Yusef Salaam – were between 14 and 16 years of age at the time of the rape and confessed after lengthy police interrogations. Each soon recanted, insisting they had admitted to the crime under the duress of exhaustion and coercion from police officers.

Another man confessed to the crime years later.

The victim, Trisha Meili, a 28-year-old investment banker, nearly died from the attack and was left with no memory of it.

The settlement still requires approval of the city's comptroller and the federal judge in Manhattan, Deborah Batts, who has overseen the case, according to the person familiar with the matter. As in most cases in which the city settles civil rights claims, the municipal government is likely to not admit wrongdoing, the person said.

Jonathan Moore, one of the lawyers for the men, refused to comment. A spokeswoman for the city's Law Department also declined to comment, citing pending litigation.

The deal comes six months after Mayor Bill de Blasio, who called for a settlement during his campaign, took office. His predecessor, Michael Bloomberg, had long resisted settling the case, with city lawyers repeatedly saying the convictions withstood legal scrutiny regardless of whether they were later vacated.

In January, the city asked for the litigation to be put on hold to explore a resolution.

The settlement was first reported on Thursday by The New York Times.

The five men were convicted in 1990 amid intense media coverage. Around 12 years later, murderer and serial rapist Matias Reyes confessed to the crime, and DNA tied him to the rape. An internal review by the Manhattan district attorney's office, which moved to throw out the convictions in 2002, found that the boys' original confessions included "troubling discrepancies".

A judge vacated the convictions. By then, however, all five had been released from prison after serving between five and 13 years. They sued the city in 2003 for wrongful conviction and violation of their civil rights, seeking $250 million in damages.

The lawsuit gained renewed attention in 2012, when famed documentary filmmaker Ken Burns released Central Park Five, a movie that cast the men as victims of racial tensions and a rush to judgment.



source

http:/ / www. d naindia. com/wo rld/rep ort-new- y ork-c ity-to-p ay-40-million-compensation-t o-5-men-w rongly-convicte d-of-1989-centr al-park-rape-199 6803

I was taken to Goa, Mussoorie & Hardwar. Raped, raped & raped for 45 days

During all their outstation visits, he forced himself on her. She kept quiet as she wanted the job," said the police officer, quoting the woman's statement.