"......victim committed suicide near the house of her parents. He further submits that the petitioners are in custody for last one year ...." !!
Ananda Mondal & Anr. ......... Petitioners
Vs
State
*****************************************************************
Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
8044/2014 on 8 August, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
C.R.M 8044 of 2014
*****************************************************************
In re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 11.07.2014 in connection with Murutia Police Station Case No.197 of 2013 dated 14.09.2013 under Sections 498A/304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
AND
Mr. Deep Chaim Kabir, Mr. Asraf Mandal ......... For the petitioners
Mr. Manjit Singh, ld. P.P, Mr. Bitashok Banerjee ......... For the State
http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; http://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com
*****************************************************************
Heard the learned advocate of both the parties.
The petitioners are seeking bail in connection with a case relating to offences punishable under Sections 498A/304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
The learned Advocate representing the petitioners submits that the victim committed suicide near the house of her parents. He further submits that the petitioners are in custody for last one year and charge sheeted co-accused has already been granted bail. The learned Public Prosecutor representing the State submits that the investigation is complete and charge sheet has been submitted. http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; http://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com
Having considered the materials in the case diary and considering the fact that the charge sheet has already been submitted and the petitioners are in custody for last one year, we are of the opinion that further detention of the accused/petitioners is not necessary.
Therefore, the accused/petitioners, namely, Ananda Mondal and Parimal Mondal be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties of like amount, of whom one must be local to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tehatta, Nadia. The application for bail, thus, stands disposed of.
(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay,J.)
(Sudip Ahluwalia,J.)
*****************************disclaimer**********************************
This judgment and other similar judgments posted on this blog was / were collected from Judis nic in website and / or other websites of Govt. of India or other internet web sites like worldlii or indiankanoon. Some notes are made by Vinayak. This is a free service provided by Vinayak (pen name). Vinayak is a member of SIF - Save Indian Family movement. SIF as a concept is committed to fighting FALSE dowry cases and elder abuse. SIF supports gender equality and a fair treatment of law abiding Indian men. Should you find the dictum in this judgment or the judgment itself repealed or amended or would like to make improvements or comments, please post a comment on the comment section of the blog or write to e _ vinayak @ yahoo . com (please remove spaces). Vinayak is NOT a lawyer and nothing in this blog and/or site and/or file should be considered as legal advise.
******************************************************************
CASE FROM JUDIS / INDIAN KANOON WEB SITE
******************************************************************
http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; http://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com
*****************
FOLLOW http://twitter.com/ATMwithDick on twitter or http://vinayak.wordpress.com/ on wordpress or http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ FOR 100s of high court and supreme court cases
regards
Vinayak
Father of a lovely daughter, criminal in the eyes of a wife, son of an compassionate elderly mother, old timer who hasn't given up, Male, activist
No comments:
Post a Comment