Excerpts
"...fact that the Family Court has found the income of the respondent to be Rs.12,000/- per month, by way of interim relief, the respondent is directed to pay Rs.2,000/- per month towards interim alimony to the petitioner/wife and Rs.5,000/- per month towards interim maintenance for the daughter....."
*****************************disclaimer**********************************
This judgment and other similar judgments posted on this blog was / were collected from Judis nic in website and / or other websites of Govt. of India or other internet web sites like worldlii or indiankanoon or High court websites. Some notes are made by Vinayak. This is a free service provided by Vinayak (pen name). Vinayak is a member of SIF - Save Indian Family movement. SIF as a concept is committed to fighting FALSE dowry cases and elder abuse. SIF supports gender equality and a fair treatment of law abiding Indian men. Should you find the dictum in this judgment or the judgment itself repealed or amended or would like to make improvements or comments, please post a comment on the comment section of the blog and if you are reading this on tumblr please post responses as comments at vinayak.wordpress.com . Vinayak is NOT a lawyer and nothing in this blog and/or site and/or file should be considered as legal advise.
******************************************************************
CASE FROM JUDIS / INDIAN KANOON WEB SITE
******************************************************************
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11510 of 2014
**********************************************************
REHA ROHAN THORAT....Petitioner(s)
Versus
ROHAN RANJITBHAI THORAT....Respondent(s)
**********************************************************
Appearance:
MR DHAVAL D VYAS, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No.1
NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No.1
http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; http://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com
**********************************************************
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI
Date : 09/10/2014
ORAL ORDER
1. Mr. Dhaval Vyas, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner has invited the attention of the court to Annexure 'D' to the petition to point out that the respondent in the matrimonial site SimplyMarry.com has shown his income to be Rs.7 to 8 lakhs per annum. It was submitted that apart from the fact that the income of the respondent is much higher than that assessed by the Family Court, even if the income as assessed by the Family Court is taken to be the income of the respondent, the amount of maintenance awarded to the petitioner and minor daughter is too meagre.
2. Despite service of notice, there is no appearance on behalf of the respondent.
3. In the aforesaid premises, having regard to the submissions advanced by the learned advocate for the petitioner as well as considering the findings recorded by the Family Court in the impugned order, the court is of the view that the matter requires consideration, hence, issue rule returnable on 17th November, 2014. Having regard to the fact that the Family Court has found the income of the respondent to be Rs.12,000/- per month, by way of interim relief, the respondent is directed to pay Rs.2,000/- per month towards interim alimony to the petitioner/wife and Rs.5,000/- per month towards interim maintenance for the daughter.
( Harsha Devani, J. ) hki
http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; http://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com
*****************
FOLLOW http://twitter.com/ATMwithDick on twitter or http://vinayak.wordpress.com/ on wordpress or http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ FOR 100s of high court and supreme court cases
regards
Vinayak
Father of a lovely daughter, criminal in the eyes of a wife, son of an compassionate elderly mother, old timer who hasn't given up, Male, activist
No comments:
Post a Comment