Thursday, July 25, 2013

woman's empowerment? innocent sis in law, living separately, runs for bail! others in famly also on bail!


Notes : Ablaa naari , wife, the poor thing , seems to have filed 498a read with sec 34 of IPC on all in family. the current petitioner is ablaa naari's sister in law, but she is live separately and is now seeking bail apprehending arrest. Kerala HC grants her bail 


************************************************************************************
CASE FROM JUDIS DOT NIC DOT IN SITE 
************************************************************************************



                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                         PRESENT:
              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN

             MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MAY 2013/30TH VAISAKHA 1935

                              Bail Appl..No. 3559 of 2013 ()
                               *******************************
               CRIME NO. 389/2013 OF NOORANADU POLICE STATION


PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.4:
*********************************

         SURYA K.S. AGED 31 YEARS
         W/O.ASHOK A.NAIR, AKSHAYAM, ERAMAKKUZHY
         NOORANADU.

         BY ADVS.SRI.R.PADMAKUMAR
                   SRI.P.ARAVIND


RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
*********************************

         STATE OF KERALA
         REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
         HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

         BY SMT. LALIZA T.Y., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

         THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
         20*05*2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:


                  S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J
                   *****************************************
                         B.A.No.3559 of 2013
                     ***********************************
             Dated this the 20th day of May, 2013


                                ORDER


     Petitioner is the 4th accused in Crime No.389 of 2013 of Nooranadu Police Station registered for offence punishable under Sections 498A and 35 r/w.34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short "the Code"). Petitioner is the sister-in-law of de facto complainant. Other accused in the crime, who are the husband and in-laws of the de facto complainant, have already been granted anticipatory bail vide Annexure A1 order subject to some conditions, is the submission of counsel. Petitioner is not involved in the crime, and she is residing separately with her family, is the further submission of counsel to urge for granting her the discretionary relief of anticipatory bail.

     2. Having regard to the facts and circumstances presented and taking note of Annexure A1 order dated 16.02.2013 extending anticipatory bail to the other accused, I find that similar treatment can be granted to petitioner also. I do note that some directions have been given to the other accused for their surrender and, then, for their release. Similar direction for surrender is not called for in the case of present petitioner, 4th accused. In the event of her arrest in the crime she shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with one solvent surety for the like sum.

     Petitioner is directed to co-operate with the investigation of the crime.

     Petition is allowed.


                                           Sd/-

                             S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE

                                      True Copy

                                      P.A. to Judge

RKM

*****************************************************************************

This judgment and other similar judgments posted on this blog was / were collected from Judis nic in website and / or other websites of Govt. of India or other internet web sites like worldlii or indiankanoon. Some notes are made by Vinayak. This is a free service provided by Vinayak (pen name). Vinayak is a member of SIF - Save Indian Family Foundation. SIF is committed to fighting FALSE dowry cases and elder abuse. SIF supports gender equality and a fair treatment of law abiding Indian men. Should you find the dictum in this judgment or the judgment itself repealed or amended or would like to make improvements or comments, please post a comment on the comment section of the blog or write to e _ vinayak @ yahoo . com (please remove spaces). Vinayak is NOT a lawyer and nothing in this blog and/or site and/or file should be considered as legal advise.