Sunday, May 25, 2014

marriage dissolved, 25 Lakhs moolah. Nothing else, no marriage date, no dispute nothin mentioned ... machine moves on !!

marriage dissolved, 25 Lakhs moolah. Nothing else, no marriage date, no dispute nothin mentioned ... machine moves on !!


Rajasthan High Court

Mr. Rakesh Kumar, For The vs Mr. S.R. Yadav, For The on 2 May, 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR

O R D E R

S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.1575/1999

(Ranjeev Sharma Vs. Mahima Sharma)

Date of Order : 02.05.2014

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA

Mr. Rakesh Kumar, for the appellant-husband.
Mr. S.R. Yadav, for the respondent-wife.
BY THE COURT

Counsel for the appellant-husband submits that pursuant to mediation by the Mediation Centre of this High Court, the parties have agreed to have their marriage dissolved under a settlement arrived in the meeting of 18.04.2014 before the Mediation Centre on the terms and conditions detailed therein. Thereunder a sum of Rs.25 lakhs has been paid as permanent alimony by the appellant-husband to the respondent-wife and received by her.

It is submitted that the amicable resolution of the matter by the Mediation Centre on 18.04.2014 was made in the presence of the parties and the order-sheet recording the settlement duly signed by them. Only a formal decree of this court in terms of the settlement before the Mediation Centre on 18.04.2014 between the parties is now required. Accordingly, this misc. appeal is allowed in terms of the agreement between the parties before the Mediation Centre of this Court on 18.04.2014. The marriage between the appellant-husband and the respondent-wife is hereby dissolved with immediate effect. Permanent alimony of Rs.25 lakhs already paid by the appellant-husband and receipted by the respondent-wife is also recorded. Decree be drawn accordingly. http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; http://vinayak.wordpress.com/

(ALOK SHARMA), J 

MS/-

All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.- Manoj Solanki, P.A



*****************************disclaimer**********************************
This judgment and other similar judgments posted on this blog was / were collected from Judis nic in website and / or other websites of Govt. of India or other internet web sites like worldlii or indiankanoon. Some notes are made by Vinayak. This is a free service provided by Vinayak (pen name). Vinayak is a member of SIF - Save Indian Family Foundation. SIF is committed to fighting FALSE dowry cases and elder abuse. SIF supports gender equality and a fair treatment of law abiding Indian men. Should you find the dictum in this judgment or the judgment itself repealed or amended or would like to make improvements or comments, please post a comment on the comment section of the blog or write to e _ vinayak @ yahoo . com (please remove spaces). Vinayak is NOT a lawyer and nothing in this blog and/or site and/or file should be considered as legal advise.
 
******************************************************************
CASE FROM JUDIS / INDIAN KANOON WEB SITE
******************************************************************

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; http://vinayak.wordpress.com/

*****************

FOLLOW http://twitter.com/ATMwithDick on twitter or http://vinayak.wordpress.com/ on wordpress or http://evinayak.tumblr.com/  FOR 100s of high court and supreme court cases
  
  
regards
  
Vinayak
Father of a lovely daughter, criminal in the eyes of a wife, son of an compassionate elderly mother, old timer who hasn't given up, Male, activist
  
  

No comments:

Post a Comment