Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Patna HC AB for husband's parents in 498a case. Marriage 06, 498a complaint 12, AB '13 !! So many 498a orders in one single day !! 498a must be big biz in Bihar now !! Sad state of matrimony !!

Patna HC AB for husband's parents in 498a case. Marriage 06, 498a complaint 12, AB now !! So many 498a orders in one single day !! 498a must be big biz in Bihar now !! Sad state of matrimony !!

*******************************************************

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20231 of 2013 (3) dt.01-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.20231 of 2013
******************************************************
1. Sk. Harmuz S/O Late Guchku 
2. Bibi Rajunya W/O Sk. Harmuz  **** **** Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar  **** **** Opposite Party/s
******************************************************
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR  SRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
01-08-2013 

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 339 of 2012 in which cognizance has been taken for the offence punishable under Section 498 A of the Indian Penal Code.

Taking into consideration that marriage of complainant was solemnized in the year 2006 and she spent her married life at her matrimonial home till filing of the aforesaid complaint case and moreover, the petitioners happen to be parents in law of the complainant and no specific overt-act has been attributed against them, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed and it is ordered that petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within three weeks from the date of receipt of this order to the court concerned, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Araria in Complaint Case No. 339 of 2012 subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.


(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

SHAHZAD/-



*****************************disclaimer**********************************
This judgment and other similar judgments posted on this blog was / were collected from Judis nic in website and / or other websites of Govt. of India or other internet web sites like worldlii or indiankanoon. Some notes are made by Vinayak. This is a free service provided by Vinayak (pen name). Vinayak is a member of SIF - Save Indian Family Foundation. SIF is committed to fighting FALSE dowry cases and elder abuse. SIF supports gender equality and a fair treatment of law abiding Indian men. Should you find the dictum in this judgment or the judgment itself repealed or amended or would like to make improvements or comments, please post a comment on the comment section of the blog or write to e _ vinayak @ yahoo . com (please remove spaces). Vinayak is NOT a lawyer and nothing in this blog and/or site and/or file should be considered as legal advise.
 
******************************************************************
CASE FROM PATNA HC WEB SITE 
******************************************************************




********************

FOLLOW 
@ATMwithDick on twitter or 
http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ (recent blog so recent cases ) 
FOR 100s of high court and supreme court cases


regards

Vinayak
Father of a lovely daughter, criminal in the eyes of a wife, son of an compassionate elderly mother, old timer who hasn't given up, Male, activist