Tuesday, August 27, 2013

what? DV agnst 12 incl. tenant? &HC said appear &seek bail!! why should tenant seek bail ? what next ? Tenant pay maintenance or what ? ..... So Hon supreme court says continue DV case against husband for the sin of marrying ablaa and in laws for begetting a son !!


what? DV agnst 12 incl. tenant? &HC said appear & seek bail!! why should tenant seek bail ? what next ? Tenant pay maintenance or what ? ..... So Hon supreme court says continue DV case against husband for the sin of marrying ablaa and in laws for begetting a son !! 

special thanks to Deepak for pointing to this order !!


*****************************disclaimer**********************************
This judgment and other similar judgments posted on this blog was / were collected from Judis nic in website and / or other websites of Govt. of India or other internet web sites like worldlii or indiankanoon. Some notes are made by Vinayak. This is a free service provided by Vinayak (pen name). Vinayak is a member of SIF - Save Indian Family Foundation. SIF is committed to fighting FALSE dowry cases and elder abuse. SIF supports gender equality and a fair treatment of law abiding Indian men. Should you find the dictum in this judgment or the judgment itself repealed or amended or would like to make improvements or comments, please post a comment on the comment section of the blog or write to e _ vinayak @ yahoo . com (please remove spaces). Vinayak is NOT a lawyer and nothing in this blog and/or site and/or file should be considered as legal advise.
 
******************************************************************
CASE FROM JUDIS WEB SITE 
******************************************************************

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 43 OF 2013

(SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.)NO.8522 OF 2010) 

ASHISH DIXIT & ORS. APPELLANTS

VERSUS

STATE OF U.P. & ANR. RESPONDENTS

O R D E R

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 05.07.2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.8358 of 2008. By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has refused to quash the proceedings initiated against the petitioners by the respondent no.2-wife, under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for brevity "the Act, 2005"). http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; http://vinayak.wordpress.com/  

3. In the petition filed by respondent no.2, apart from arraying her husband and her parents-in-law as parties to the proceedings, has included all and sundry, asPage 2 respondents. To say the least, she has even alleged certain actions said to have been done by the tenant whose name is not even known to her. 

4. In a matter of this nature, we are of the opinion that the High Court at least should have directed that the petition filed by respondent no.2 be confined to her husband as also her parents-in-law and should not have allowed the impleadment of respondent nos.4 to 12. http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; http://vinayak.wordpress.com/  

5. In view of the above, while allowing this appeal in part, we quash the proceedings as against appellant nos. 4 to 12 in Case No.240 of 2007. We direct the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra to proceed with the aforesaid case; only against the husband i.e. Shri Ashish Dixit, S/o. Padmakar Dutt Sharma, her father in law, Shri Padmakar Dutt Sharma, S/o.late Pt.Diwakar Dutt Sharma and Smt.Girja Dixit, W/o.Shri Padmakar Dutt Sharma, her mother in law.

6. We are of the opinion that the direction issued by the High Court, inter-alia, directing the appellants herein to appear before the Trial Court and seek bail is wholly unnecessary. 


*****************J. (H.L. DATTU)

*****************J. (CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD)

NEW DELHI;

JANUARY 07, 2013.


**************************************************************************
FOLLOW http://twitter.com/ATMwithDick on twitter or http://vinayak.wordpress.com/ on wordpress or http://evinayak.tumblr.com/  FOR 100s of high court and supreme court cases
  
  
regards
  
Vinayak
Father of a lovely daughter, criminal in the eyes of a wife, son of an compassionate elderly mother, old timer who hasn't given up, Male, activist