Its official - Madras HC agrees that MORE THAN HALF of all CHILD sexual abuse victims are BOYS! 52.94% boys & 47.06% girls;
Quoting the Honb'le HC "....In order to examine the incidence of sexual abuse among child respondents, the questionnaire was administered to 12,447 children belonging to the five different categories including children in family environment, children in schools, children in institutions, children at work and street children. The study looked into four severe forms and five other forms of sexual abuse. Out of the total child respondents, 53.22% reported having faced one or more forms of sexual abuse that included severe and other forms. Among them 52.94% were boys and 47.06% girls....."
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 07/03/2012
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU
W.P.(MD)No.8355 of 2011
and
W.P.(MD)No.12572 of 2011
and
M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011
M.Veersamy .. Petitioner in
both writ petitions
Vs.
1.State of Tamilnadu,
represented by Home Secretary,
Secretariat, Fort St. George,
Chennai.
2.District Collector,
Madurai District,
Collectorate,
Madurai.
3.Superintendent of Police,
O/o. Superintendent of Police,
Madurai District, Madurai. .. Respondents 1 to 3 in
both writ petitions
4.Inspector of Police,
Koodal Pudhur Police Station,
Koodal Pudhur,
Madurai.
5.Arockiyasamy
6.The Chief Educational Officer,
Madurai District.
7.K.Amalirose
8.Shanmuga Kumaraswamy
9.Director,
Directorate of Social Welfare,
Chepauk,
Chennai.
(R6 to R9 impleaded as party
respondents as per order of the court
dated 24.08.2011)
10.U.Vasuki
D/o.R.Umanath,
State General Secretary,
All India Democratic Women's Association,
13, Mosque Street,
Chepauk, Chennai.
(R-10 impleded as per the order of the court
dated 16.12.2011 in MP(MD)No.4/2011)..
Respondents 4 to 9 in W.P.(MD)No.8355/2011
4.Chief Educational Officer,
Chief Educational Office,
Madurai District.
Madurai.
5.Inspector of Police,
Koodal Pudhur Police Station,
Koodal Pudhur,
Madurai.
6.Investigating Officer/Inspector of Police,
All women Police Station,
Samayanallur,
Madurai District.
7.S.Arockiayasamy
8.K.Amalirose
9.Shanmuga Kumarasamy ..
Respondents 4 to 9 in W.P.No.12572 of 2011
W.P.(MD)No.8355 of 2011 has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the third respondent to constitute a special investigating team led by a gender sensitive police officer not below the rank of D.S.P consisting of experienced and sensitive police officers preferably female and to transfer the investigation of Crime No.331 of 2011 from the fourth respondent to the newly constituted special team for the effective investigation of the case in the light of the guidelines evolved by the Honourable Supreme Court in Delhi Domestic Working Women Forum Vs. Union of India and Sakshi Vs. Union of India and directing the second respondent to take necessary steps to restore confidence among the girl students of the Government High School, Podhumbu by involving Child Welfare Committee and other agencies if necessary.
REST OF THE JUDGEMENT UPLOADED TO LINK BELOW
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-JZGIVy-RW5czdqYWx6QzROQlU/edit?usp=sharing
No comments:
Post a Comment