should BAIL be based on what a WITNESS says ?? or based on liberty of individual, severity of offence etc etc ???

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

ORDER

IN S.B. Cr. Misc. 2nd Bail Application No.1564/2013

Indraraj alias Guddu Vs. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor

Date of Order ::: 19.09.2013

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Harendra Singh Sinsinwar, counsel for petitioner Shri Sanjeev Kumar Mahala, Public Prosecutor http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; http://vinayak.wordpress.com/

***************************

By the Court:-

The first bail application of petitioner, being Bail Application No.2539/2012, was dismissed by this court vide order dated 28.03.2012 with direction to trail court to conclude the trail at the earliest and petitioner was given liberty to again apply for bail before the court below itself after statements of key prosecution witnesses are recorded. http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; 

http://vinayak.wordpress.com/

Learned Public Prosecutor submits that though statements of key prosecution witnesses have been record, but they have deposed against the accusedpetitioner.

This second bail application is accordingly dismissed on merits as the key prosecution witnesses have deposed against the accused-petitioner. http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; http://vinayak.wordpress.com/

(Mohammad Rafiq) J

*****************************disclaimer**********************************

This judgment and other similar judgments posted on this blog was / were collected from Judis nic in website and / or other websites of Govt. of India or other internet web sites like worldlii or indiankanoon. Some notes are made by Vinayak. This is a free service provided by Vinayak (pen name). Vinayak is a member of SIF - Save Indian Family Foundation. SIF is committed to fighting FALSE dowry cases and elder abuse. SIF supports gender equality and a fair treatment of law abiding Indian men. Should you find the dictum in this judgment or the judgment itself repealed or amended or would like to make improvements or comments, please post a comment on the comment section of the blog or write to e _ vinayak @ yahoo . com (please remove spaces). Vinayak is NOT a lawyer and nothing in this blog and/or site and/or file should be considered as legal advise.

 

******************************************************************

CASE FROM JUDIS / INDIAN KANOON WEB SITE 

******************************************************************

*****************

FOLLOW http://twitter.com/ATMwithDick on twitter or http://vinayak.wordpress.com/ on wordpress or http://evinayak.tumblr.com/  FOR 100s of high court and supreme court cases

  

  

regards

  

Vinayak

Father of a lovely daughter, criminal in the eyes of a wife, son of an compassionate elderly mother, old timer who hasn't given up, Male, activist